Fairfax: their Rights At Work are more important than Yours.

As a result of industrial action, Illawarra Mercury becomes the ‘New Zealand Mercury’ as jobs go offshore.

I support the right of anyone to strike, this is not union or strike bashing, this is hypocrisy bashing.

Ever since that fateful day in 2007 when Kevin Rudd and his government kicked out the Tory overlords, the media in this country have done little else but champion a return to a Coalition Government. Not just the obviously right-wing Murdoch (70%) media, but also the ABC and Fairfax.

Why? Murdoch’s right-wing leanings are just how he does business, and is no surprise. But why have the ABC and Fairfox given up balance and fairness – and accuracy – to present a highly partisan news?

There are several theories, partisan journalists present partisan stories, which means other journalists report from a right-wing perspective to keep up. or, because they have an agenda to achieve regime change. Or it is car-crash government, Tony Abbott as prime minister would be so spectacularly bad that daily disasters would reverse the sales slide.

The majority of Limited News ownership was offshored to an American billionaire, and their journalists seem to have no problem with it.

So now that Fairfax are planning on offshoring subeditors jobs to New Zealand – first the Illawarra Mercury and the Newcastle Herald, and later on more jobs from more papers and websites.

Which is a strange reaction coming from a media group that have been nothing short of a PR machine for the Coalition – a party that if they ever got into government would most likely outlaw strikes and other industrial action as part of their “flexibility Work Choices”.

A media group that have run “union thug” stories and how striking teachers “don’t care about your kids” stories. Perhaps they think their right to be in a union and take industrial action is more important than every other worker in this country.

Howard’s Work Choices left workers with little rights, and the conditions they put on some industries such as the Construction Industry were draconian, where a union member Ark Tribe was imprisoned for taking part in a union meeting about safety on a work site.

And now Fairfax journalists are on strike about their rights at work? While they have every right to strike as much as the next worker, they should perhaps have a little more self-awareness of what their editorial direction has become, and what regime change would mean for millions of workers in this country.


6 Comments to “Fairfax: their Rights At Work are more important than Yours.”

  1. Fairfax journos, Boo hoo

    • Ive seen them asking people to respect the digital picket line, not even click or post links to fairfax, wouldnt it be nice if they could at least think about what the Opposition would do if they got into govt

  2. Yes, of course you have my permission to run it as a post. Feel free to edit for clarification where necessary. Thanks for the recognition, and the great blog!

  3. You make good points as usual. I concur with your theories as to why the previously balanced Fairfax and ABC have followed the News Limited lead into right wing slant. There is a blinkered groupthink evident in much of the ‘reporting’ of Australian politics. Journalists interview other journalists in the electronic media (eg Insiders, Meet The Press and talkback radio). This results in a right wing echo chamber where Coalition spinners and media ‘opinion leaders’ set the stage for the slant which others adopt. And which become accepted conventional wisdom.

    Memes such as the “BER debacle” are an example of this. In reality the BER was NOT a debacle. It was a successful, efficient and highly effective economic stimulus measure, delivered in a timely fashion by the Rudd/Gillard administration, whose quick implementation was instrumental in helping to avert economic catastrophe as the early waves of the GFC threatened to overtake the domestic economy. But the way it was spun by the Coalition/media was that the money was wasted (the percentage of documented waste was actually low compared to private spending and most government spending). The spin from the anti-Labor forces in the Coalition/media took over, became the accepted ‘reality’, and was never successfully corrected/defended by the government – to their shame.

    There are other examples too. The Home Insulation Program, another highly effective stimulus measure which triggered economic activity in every postcode are of the country and resulted in fewer housefires per thousand dwellings insulated than had previously been the case – was depicted in a topsy-turvy fashion as causing untold deaths and destruction. Again the government, to their discredit, did not work hard enough to set the record straight.

    Perhaps the government were naive, assuming the public would be smart enough to see the truth for themselves. Unfortunately, the great percentage of the public only get to see and hear what the media want them to hear, meaning truth and facts are thin on the ground and difficult for the average time-poor and politically disengaged voter to assimilate.

    The Coalition, it seems, have nothing better to do with their days than set spotfires of spin and misinformation burning, which are naturally taken up by their media supporters, and before you know what’s happening, there are wildfires of lies consuming the political debate.

    Clearly the government needs to be more vigilant here. Perhaps their media office needs a kick in pants and tasked to put out the spot fires as soon as they are lit. This is distraction which the government does not need, but must do anyway for the sake of survival. If there were such a thing as a Labor-supportive media outlet or two (which we know there is not), they could take up the cudgels on Labor’s behalf, telling the truth which would negate the Coalition’s lies. There being no progressive mainstream media whatsoever, the government must – must! – become more pro-active and assertive in its media relations.

    I agree also with your contention of car-crash government under Abbott. The guy is a walking, talking gaffe generator. As you’ve documented here on the blog in instance after instance he’s only got to open his big mouth and the gaffes start flowing like water from a tap. As PM (perish the thought) he would give rise to daily stories of foot-in-mouth. The clangers would fill newspaper columns, the stories would practically write themselves. Which would be considered a bonus by the lazy, self-serving commentatariat who’ve given up on honestly reporting policy, preferring instead the trivial and personality-centred rubbish which enlightens no one but would stimulate sales of papers. It would undoubtedly be highly entertaining in a way to see the daily reports of the fool’s faux pas… but what a price to pay for the country to be subjected to such an inane extremist at the helm.

    • with your permission, could I run this comment as a post, it is too good to be buried as a comment

      if not… ‘Perhaps the government were naive, assuming the public would be smart enough to see the truth for themselves. Unfortunately’ yes, how do ALP get elected when they are so naive about voters

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: